Exploring the many causes of the american civil war

On this occasion the threat of military force worked. Whether he could have done this in the South is a moot topic. Moreover, Northerners had invested heavily in an expansive and varied transportation system that included canals, roads, steamboats, and railroads; in financial industries such as banking and insurance; and in a large communications network that featured inexpensive, widely available newspapers, magazines, and books, along with the telegraph.

Gordon, CSA, in his Memoirs, Chapter 1, first page The message here is that the reasons a nation goes to war are usually various and complicated. Leading politicians, moreover, often served as a focus for popular interests, aspirations, and values.

Whenever you have two people—or peoples—joined in politics but doing diametrically opposing things, it is almost inevitable that at some point tensions and jealousies will break out.

Exploring the Perspectives of the Civil War

Put another way, it was well known that Lincoln was anti-slavery, but both during his campaign for office and after his election, he insisted it was never his intention to disturb slavery where it already existed. We are not engaged in a Quixotic fight for the rights of man Slave "patrollers" and "overseers" also won prestige in their communities.

Federal vs States Rights Following from the issue with slavery and the south feeling they were losing control the south turned to rights through law to protect their interests further. By denying slaveholders the right to extend their boundaries, Lincoln would in effect also be weakening their power in Washington, and over time this would almost inevitably have resulted in the abolition of slavery, as sooner or later the land would have worn out.

The Lincoln administration was able to quell secession movements in several Border States—Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and what would become West Virginia—by a combination of politics and force, including suspension of the Bill of Rights. Over the years this group became stronger and by the s had turned into a full-fledged movement, preaching abolition from pulpits and podiums throughout the North, publishing pamphlets and newspapers, and generally stirring up sentiments both fair and foul in the halls of Congress and elsewhere.

Tyrant, Hypocrite or Consummate Statesman The key to understanding Abraham Lincoln's philosophy of statesmanship is that he always sought the meeting point between what was right in theory and what could be achieved in practice.

The First an Inferior Race: Although a minority of free Southerners owned slaves, free Southerners of all classes nevertheless defended the institution of slavery [37] — threatened by the rise of free labor abolitionist movements in the Northern states— as the cornerstone of their social order.

He advocated enslaving Northern factory workers, for their own benefit. The North was almost in complete contrast to the South.

By the per capita wealth of Southern whites was twice that of Northerners, and three-fifths of the wealthiest individuals in the country were Southerners.

While the two sides that made up the American Civil War were apart in many areas, it became worse when the perception in the South was that the North would try to impose its values on the South. On the northern side, abolitionists like John Brown and Henry Ward Beecher of Connecticut were willing to make war in order to put an immediate end to the institution of slavery.

But during the Kansas controversy a confrontation between a senator and a congressman stood out as particularly shocking.

The abolitionist north had a difficult time matching the pro-slavery south passage for passage. Whether a man who came from the Netherlands could have forced his way into the social hierarchy of the South is again a question open to debate.

The abolitionist north had a difficult time matching the pro-slavery south passage for passage. For example, the " slave patrols " were among the institutions bringing together southern whites of all classes in support of the prevailing economic and racial order.

For a time it appeared the practice was on its way to extinction. He saw the industrial Northeast forming a coalition with the agrarian Midwest against the Plantation South. Indeed, opposition to homestead laws was far more common in secessionist rhetoric than opposition to tariffs. It is probably safe to say that the original impetus of the Civil War was set in motion when a Dutch trader offloaded a cargo of African slaves at Jamestown, Va.

Later, South Carolina legislators acted on this assertion and defied the federal government to overrule them, lest the state secede. By contrast, Southerners described free labor as "greasy mechanics, filthy operators, small-fisted farmers, and moonstruck theorists".

Many in the traditional slave states saw this as the first step towards abolishing slavery throughout the Union and thus the destruction of the southern way of life. The South certainly lost the shooting war.

The causes of the American Civil War are actually quite complex and require research and analysis to understand their roots. Policing and punishing blacks who transgressed the regimentation of slave society was a valued community service in the South, where the fear of free blacks threatening law and order figured heavily in the public discourse of the period.

Exploring the Perspectives of the Civil War

Thornton contends that Alabama was engulfed in a severe crisis long before While the two sides that made up the American Civil War were apart in many areas, it became worse when the perception in the South was that the North would try to impose its values on the South. The Charleston Mercury read that on the issue of slavery the North and South "are not only two Peoples, but they are rival, hostile Peoples.

Some Southern historians in the past have argued this was the root cause of the Civil War. It wasn’t, but it was a critical ingredient in the suspicion and mistrust Southerners were beginning to feel about their Northern brethren, and by extension about the Union itself.

To understand the causes of the Civil War, you must be aware of some important events in American history — from roughly (the Missouri Compromise) to (the election of Abraham Lincoln) — that culminated in the secession of 11 Southern states.

Therefore for many people slavery is the key issue to explain the causes of the American Civil War.

Causes of the Civil War: A Balanced Answer

However, it is not as simple as this and slavery, while a major issue, was not the only issue that pushed American into the ‘Great American Tragedy’. Main Causes of the American Civil War There are five main reasons for the outcome of Civil War in America; these causes were slavery, economy, Federal versus State rights, Abraham Lincoln becoming president and the Battle of Fort Sumter.

To understand the causes of the Civil War, you must be aware of some important events in American history — from roughly (the Missouri Compromise) to (the election of Abraham Lincoln) — that culminated in the secession of 11 Southern states.

American Civil War, also called War Between the States, four-year war (–65) between the United States and 11 Southern states that seceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States of America. By contrast, the Southern economy was based principally on large farms (plantations) that.

Exploring the many causes of the american civil war
Rated 0/5 based on 81 review
American Civil War | Causes, Definition, History, & Facts | lookbeyondthelook.com